tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1930103.post2385842392903518091..comments2024-03-29T10:17:18.826+00:00Comments on No Rock And Roll Fun: How do you actually demand a chart recount?Simon Hayes Budgenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07084524317888577404noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1930103.post-69792748430477671912008-09-05T09:21:00.000+00:002008-09-05T09:21:00.000+00:00But they're back! And they've got new hats!... I m...But they're back! And they've got new hats!... I mean masks!Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17694862962806131000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1930103.post-67485594095853934772008-09-05T07:30:00.000+00:002008-09-05T07:30:00.000+00:00I think the biggest surprise in this story is that...I think the biggest surprise in this story is that it's the Slipknot record that makes number one. Slipknot at number one in 2008? Didn't their shtick get tired somewhere around 2002???Spencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11043035917980747955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1930103.post-3552823668013521002008-09-04T17:53:00.000+00:002008-09-04T17:53:00.000+00:00But if a quick count again can cause #1 and #2 to ...But if a quick count again can cause #1 and #2 to be transposed, then presumably the lower reaches of the chart, where the difference between, say number 70 and number 80 can be in the dozens, must be as unreliable as to be pointless. They might as well just get someone from Wal_Mart to draw the chart up from memory of what they put through the till.Simon Hayes Budgenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07084524317888577404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1930103.post-3530647893699085732008-09-04T17:01:00.000+00:002008-09-04T17:01:00.000+00:00http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1492244/20041013/...http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1492244/20041013/strait_george.jhtml<BR/><BR/>Apparently it's not unusual for them to 'reprocess' data like this. As you suggest, quite how it can be reprocessed at all is strange...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com