"We maintain that the immigration judge in the initial hearing made a material error in law.
"We will continue to oppose the entry to the UK of individuals where we believe there may be a risk to the public."
"We will continue to oppose the entry to the UK of individuals where we believe there may be a risk to the public."
Curious they should insist it was an error in law, rather than in judgement, as we're pretty certain the appeal by Mr. Dogg was upheld because the judge didn't think there had been any risk demonstrated, not because of some clever, Alan Shaw style legal arguments from the Snoop team. Does the Labour government really feel that British people would sleep less soundly if Snoop was allowed to take rooms in Hounslow or Havant? Are they that far out of touch?
No comments:
Post a Comment
As a general rule, posts will only be deleted if they reek of spam.