Dozier diddled

Of course, nobody would object to Lamont Dozier getting eights cent a download, as he asks for in the LA Times. But there's two points missing from his article - first: has he seen his income fall since people started "stealing" music off the internet?

And, secondly, why hasn't he stopped to ask the people he's doubtless paying large cash sums to manage his affairs why it's only in the last couple of months they've started to get round to making legitimate downloads available?

It's all very well moaning at music fans, but for the first million or so downloads of Stop In The Name of Love, there was no alternative, was there?