Thursday, June 01, 2006

RONAN KEATING WEIGHS INTO HEALTH DEBATE

Because he's a middling popstar with a middling managerial career, Ronan Keating has decided that he understands health funding better than Dr Paul Walker, chair of Welsh public health association PHA Cymru.

Walker suggested that cancer took more than an equitable share of the money spent on health and research in the UK, compared with the levels of cash spent on, say, respiritory diseases.

Walker went on to point to the number of celebrities who front up cancer fundraisers, saying they helped "mismatch" the money. He was basing his comments on an in-depth survey of funding patterns conducted by the UK Clinical Research Collaboration.

Ronan Keating, presumably drawing on his knowledge of how to put together a ballad, went ballistic:

You don't knock charities that are doing good work."

He added: "It is disgraceful that a doctor could say something like that. He said that men and women in the street fear cancer more than they should - if one in three people are being diagnosed with cancer, they have every right to be concerned.

"I am very disappointed in him. It is totally absurd that someone in his position could say these things."


Well, up to a point, Lord Keating. Obviously, Ronan's experience of cancer is coloured by the loss of his mother to the disease, something you wouldn't wish on anyone. But to describe it as "absurd" when someone attempts to put the cancer risk into context and to point out that if you pour all your funds into one, trendy cause disease it starves other areas of cash - that might be overstepping your area of expertise, Ronan.


3 comments:

Tim F said...

Would Mr Keating be so irate if some of the cancer dosh were redirected to finding a cure for being a bland, talentless, sanctimonious, kickable dicksplash?

Anonymous said...

I can sympathise with Onan as I lost both my parents to Cancer. It's pretty clear it does need funding and all, but Dr Walker clearly also has a very valid point, backed up by more than a hunch or emotions.

But it flags up a very modern problem: every bugger thinks they are an expert on everything. People who read the dailies, go on the net for an hour or so, see a Tv documentary, think they are 'experts' and qualified to comment on matters they clearly don't have a frigging clue about: your average Joe thinks he can now sentence better than judges, decide policy better than civil servants and advise on medical matters better than consultants. We're all guilty to some degree, I think. But it's also why guys like Bono and Geldof can sound to laymen like they are experts in advising aid and development policy.

Tsk!

Anonymous said...

That and the fact that Dr Walker patently wasn't actually knocking the good work that people were doing for charity.

Post a Comment

As a general rule, posts will only be deleted if they reek of spam.