Thom Yorke dons the green eye-shield
Today's Observer magazine has been guest-edited by Thom Yorke; it's a climate change special and in his introduction he suggests that his larger-than-average global footprint is a help, rather than a hindrance, in spreading the message:
At first I told Friends of the Earth that I was absolutely the wrong person to be associated with their campaign. I've based my life on touring and the rock industry is a high energy-consuming industry. But they persuaded me that that was exactly why it was a good idea for me to be involved, that they didn't want to present a holier-than-thou message.
That's true - and makes a certain degree of sense - although how far would you take that? There's a sense that this is the environmental equivalent of those times when Keith Richards tells pop stars to not take drugs, isn't it?
But, for a whiskey priest, Yorke is pretty passionate and takes well to his brief - interviewing Ken Livingstone about plans to bring bike rental to central London, for example. Sadly, he doesn't get his hands dirty with testing alternatives to bin liners.
2 comments:
How exactly does being a hypocrite make Yorke the ideal poster boy for climate change?
Ken Livingstone showed his true colours, though:
"I'm quite prepared to have a nanny state if it means we survive. I'd rather have a nanny state and live than we all burn in some catastrophic climate change disaster."
Fuck you, Ken.
Sorry, too gripped in a teeth grinding rage to approach today's Observer with anything approaching sense. The piece on food miles, which is a total reversal of the stance the paper has been taking for months will have me punching endangered species ofr the rest of the week.
Grrrrr.
I think the point about Yorke is that he at least acknowledges his own contribution to the problem; as distinct from the sort of rockstar who'd fly between two UK cities to appear on telly at a gig promoting environmental awareness, say, or complain about poverty and then get somebody to fly their hat out to another country when they left it behind.
Naming no names.
Post a Comment
As a general rule, posts will only be deleted if they reek of spam.