Gordon in the morning: Innocent victims
It's not much, but Gordon tries gamely to make a story out of Pixie Geldof leaving a shop with a dress she hasn't paid for.
Rich people like Pixie don't shop in stores where alarms go off when you carry stock out; it's probably why those who do pay end up paying such ridiculous prices for their trousers.
Peaches, apparently, had confused the dress with a scarf:
[S]he then returned with her tail between her legs, explaining she had picked the dress up by mistake because it was the same colour as her scarf.
When she brought the dress back the next day it had the label ripped out. But to make up for the misunderstanding, generous Peaches decided to keep it and paid up.
When she brought the dress back the next day it had the label ripped out. But to make up for the misunderstanding, generous Peaches decided to keep it and paid up.
Presumably the label was ripped out as she sought to discover how her scarf had somehow turned into a dress.
Oddly, Gordon runs a series of pictures of Madonna's children because, erm, they went for a meal.
We're not quite sure how that fits with the Press Complaints Commission code of practice rule 6.v:
v) Editors must not use the fame, notoriety or position of a parent or guardian as sole justification for publishing details of a child’s private life.
I'm sure we're just missing the justification here.
2 comments:
Both Geldof children seem to have an almost Ryder-esque habit of mistaking other peoples' property for her own.
Pixie or Peaches? Both are mixed-up in this article.
Either way, Peaches got caught trying to nick something out the Oxford St Topshop a while back, so it wouldn't be the first time one of them 'accidentally' left without paying...
Post a Comment
As a general rule, posts will only be deleted if they reek of spam.