Wednesday, June 08, 2005

JACKO'S CHARACTER WITNESS IN COURT

A big plus for Michael Jackson's defence team was the appearance by Macaulay Culkin denying that Jackop had ever touched him. But now that Culkin has pleaded guilty to xanax and dope possession, it's questionable if Culkin could be expected to remember anything clearly at all.


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why? I didn't expect to see something this wide of the mark from you. He's been arrested for drug possession, there's no suggestion that he'd be unable to accurately recall something as traumatic as molestation. The 'He takes drugs so we can't trust anything he's ever said or done' argument smacks of the kind of lazy journalism that you normally hold in such contempt. You're suspicious of Jacko, and with good reason, but you don't have to stoop this low to make a point.

Simon Hayes Budgen said...

Fair enough. It was a cheap shot, although it was intended as as a joke rather than a definitive piece of commentary.

Post a Comment

As a general rule, posts will only be deleted if they reek of spam.