Ratcheting up the ticket price
James P has sent us an interesting report from the LA Times on ticket prices in the US. The most eye-catching detail is that Prince followed the same pricing logic for Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel as he has for his forthcoming Millennium Dome gigs, taking the 3121 title of his album as a starting point. Only, rather than making them £31.21, he went with $3121. No, there's no missing decimal point there, but at least it was three grand for two tickets. He's all heart.
This is against a background of escalating ticket charges in the US - suddenly, all pop stars are Gordon Gekko:
"The stigma on that has changed."
The average concert ticket price climbed to $61.58 last year from $25.81 in 1996. Tickets are generally priced based on the acts — and the demographics of their fans. The Cheetah Girls, for example, sold their tickets for an average of $35; Fallout Boy, $27. Seeing Barbra Streisand cost an average of $298.
While the Prince tickets were eye-watering, compared with the top-end of the market that's virtually charitable:
And what's the logic behind charging fifteen grand for Matthews and Joel?
Well, you remember how in the Commons this week Harvey Goldsmith was explaining how promoters carefully set their prices to be fair rather than grabbing the gig-goer by the testicles and shaking like the secondary marketeers do? Apparently, American promoters don't feel the same:
"We believe our ticket price is in line with what ticket-reselling websites such as StubHub already get for high-profile events."
That makes a certain, ruthless, business logic - although with the built-in risk of pricing acts like Joel out of the mass market at a time when their largest sales come through the three-ninetynine CD bins in petrol stations - but does mean that, in future, promoters can hardly use "secondary sales rip people off by charging higher prices" as a line of attack, can they?
No comments:
Post a Comment
As a general rule, posts will only be deleted if they reek of spam.